Search Menu Search Powered by Blogger Jobfinder newspaper Course Guide Events Heritage Insights Follow Focus IC4 Project Tools Fighter billions Stem Rejsekortet Toxic fluorine compounds from waste to resource Ebola epidemic Denmark switches coal out of pellets Engineer's Product Award 2014
The Danish grass and clover producer DLF is part of an EU project to develop new types of grass that are more degradable and thus more suitable for the production of biofuels. By Morten Lund July 6, 2009 at. 7:04
One of the actors in the project, which will run until 2012, becoming the Danish seed business DLF-Trifolium. The world's largest grass and clover manufacturer must therefore help to breed new grasses that can increase the efficiency of biofuel production and thus better satisfy the growing need for green fuels.
As it is today, produced second-generation biofuels from cellulose in straw, corn and grass. abbey vet But it is still small with efficiency because plant cell walls are so persistent.
"Biofuel production should be speeded up, and we are not good enough at it. But if we can come closer to understanding abbey vet why some grasses are easily digested, and others are difficult to digest, then we have come a long way, "says senior scientist at DLF, Thomas Didion. The key is to break down the individual substances
He explains that the project is in part about identifying and nominating the individual genes in the grasses, partly transform the selected genes into new grass species - that influence and alter cell wall components as much as possible.
First stage - nærstudiet abbey vet of cell structure - takes care of chemistry abbey vet researchers. DLF-Trifolium's role will be to transform the most promising genes into the different types of grasses that the end of the project to act guinea pigs.
"How is the cell wall built? Which genes do what, and how is the cell wall so strong? We do not know quite yet, but we hope to find the key to breaking down the individual substances, "explains Thomas Didion. New grass is still far in the future abbey vet
Since the process is so similar, the research project's results thus get the cows and the milk industry for good. The best milk comes from cows on pasture, but when grass is difficult to degrade abbey vet in cows' stomachs, sheep cows today only 40 percent of their food from pasture, the rest coming from concentrates.
But if it succeeded DLF to develop new grasses that are more degradable - also in cow stomachs - predicts Thomas Didion that it would save agriculture to spend money on just alternative crops for forage production. abbey vet
So over the next decade, the project will bring together researchers from the plant biology, chemistry, enzymology and plant breeding. The EU supports the interdisciplinary project with a total of 5.7 million euros - almost 42 million.
Send See also politicians about-face: Now biopetrol suddenly a dirty word April 16, 2008 GMO - a shortcut to more bio-energy? April 19, 2008 Questions and answers about GMO 06th March 2009 No to GMO foods 07. May 2009 Mutation make cereal healthier and better for the environment June 13, 2009 seed company gives up Denmark's only genetically modified crop June 25, 2009 Read also
What is the EU project? Is there a website? Who is responsible for the project and who are the partners? There are cell wall researchers at both the Life Sciences Faculty, the University and the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University. Are both with?
Think incidentally expense of burdens of proof. abbey vet GM researchers must prove that there is absolutely no risk whatsoever is GMO. Climate scientists must prove that it will go very wrong with the world before someone will lift a finger to prevent the destruction.
Think incidentally expense of burdens of proof. GM researchers must prove that there is absolutely no risk whatsoever is GMO. Climate scientists must prove that it will go very wrong with the world before someone will lift a finger to prevent the destruction.
Agree - and there are more parallels: Those that are possible. victims of the negative effects of GW will have a guarantee that it will not happen. Those who need to invest in equipment to reduce GW will have the assurance that it is not a "bubble" that turns out to be a false alarm before they have served their investments. - This creates a controversy abbey vet that just seems to be due. Different starting points.
Regarding. Your question, the answer is already partially: GMOs can increase avlinger, avlingers value and cut emissions of earthworks (which both saves energy and store CO2 in topsoil) may be one of the greatest contributions to reducing climate emissions. - It looks provisionally not seem to affect the attitude towards GMOs substantially? - Perhaps as including we "usual suspects" on this site have written enough about it? :-)
One might get the idea that there are now saddled on projects with such long time horizons that they should not be approved in the current political reality. It can be seen
No comments:
Post a Comment